| Officials cover up wind farm noise report |
| LINK> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6954565.ece |
|
Officials cover up wind farm noise
report
December 13, 2009
Civil servants have suppressed warnings that
wind turbines can generate noise damaging people’s health for several
square miles around.
The guidance from consultants indicated that
the sound level permitted from spinning blades and gearboxes had been
set so high — 43 decibels — that local people could be disturbed
whenever the wind blew hard. The noise was also thought likely to
disrupt sleep.
The report said the best way to protect
locals was to cut the maximum permitted noise to 38 decibels, or 33
decibels if the machines created discernible “beating” noises as they
spun.
It has now emerged that officials removed
the warnings from the draft report in 2006 by Hayes McKenzie Partnership
(HMP), the consultants. The final version made no mention of them.
It means that hundreds of turbines at wind
farms in Britain have been allowed to generate much higher levels of
noise, sparking protests from people living near them.
Among those affected is Jane Davis, 53, a
retired National Health Service manager, who has had to abandon her home
because of the noise.
It lies half a mile from the Deeping St
Nicholas wind farm in south Lincolnshire whose eight turbines began
operating in 2006.
“Our problems started three days after the
turbines went up and they’ve carried on ever since. It’s like having
helicopters going over the top of you at times — on a bad night it’s
like three or four helicopters circling around,” she said.
“We abandoned our home. We rent a house
about five miles away — this is our fourth Christmas out of our own
home. We couldn’t sleep. It is torture — my GP describes it as torture.
Three hours of sleep a night is torture.”
The HMP report was commissioned by the
business department whose responsibilities for wind power have since
been taken over by Ed Miliband’s Department of Energy and Climate Change
(DECC).
The decision to stick with existing noise
limits became official guidance for local authorities ruling on planning
applications from wind farm developers.
It has also been used by ministers and
officials to support the view that there was no need to revise official
wind farm noise guidelines and that erecting turbines near homes posed
no threat to people’s health and wellbeing.
In 2007 Mike Hulme of the Den Brook Judicial
Review Group, a band of residents opposing a wind turbine development
close to their houses in Devon, submitted a Freedom of Information
request asking to see all draft versions of the study.
Officials refused the request, claiming it
was not in the public interest for them to be released. Hulme appealed
to the information commissioner’s office, which has ordered Miliband’s
department to release the documents. The drafts show the HMP originally
recommended that the night-time wind turbine noise limit should be
reduced from 43 decibels to 38, or 33 if they made any kind of swishing
or beating noise — known as “aerodynamic modulation”.
The HMP researchers had based their
recommendations on evidence. They took noise measurements at houses
close to three wind farms: Askam in Cumbria, Bears Down in Cornwall and
Blaen Bowi in Carmarthenshire.
They found that the swish-swish signature
noise of turbines was significantly greater around most wind farms than
had been foreseen by the authors of the existing government guidelines,
which date from 1996. They also found that the beating sound is
particularly disruptive at night, when other background noise levels are
lower, as it can penetrate walls.
In their draft report the HMP researchers
recommended that “Consideration be given to a revision of the night-time
absolute noise criterion”, noting that this would fit with World Health
Organisation recommendations on sleep disturbance.
However, an anonymous government official
then inserted remarks attacking this idea because it would impede wind
farm development. He, or she, wrote: “What will the impact of this be?
Are we saying that this is the situation for all wind farms ... I think
we need a sense of the scale of this and the impact.”
The final report removed any suggestion of
cutting the noise limits or adding any further penalty if turbines
generated a beating noise — and recommended local authorities to stick
to the 1996 guidelines.
Hulme said: “This demonstrates the conflict
of interests in DECC, because it has the responsibility for promoting
wind farm development while also having responsibility for the wind farm
noise guidance policy ... meant to protect local residents.”
Ron Williams, 74, a retired lecturer, lives
half a mile from the Wharrels Hill wind farm in Cumbria. He has been
forced to use sleeping pills since its eight turbines began operating in
2007.
“The noise we get is the gentle swish swish
swish, non-stop, incessant, all night,” he said. “It’s like a Chinese
torture. In winter, when the sun is low in the sky, it goes down behind
the turbines and causes flickering shadows coming into the room.
“It’s like somebody shining car headlights
at your window ... on and off, on and off. It affects us all. It’s
terrible. Absolutely horrible.”
Lynn Hancock, 45, runs a garden maintenance
business. She has suffered disruption since 2007 when the 12-turbine Red
Tile wind farm began operating several hundred yards from her
Cambridgeshire home.
“Imagine a seven-ton lorry left running on
the drive all night and that’s what it’s like,” she said. “People
describe it as like an aeroplane or a helicopter or a train that never
arrives. It’s like it’s coming but it never gets here.”
Such problems are likely to increase.
Britain has 253 land-based wind farms generating 3.5 gigawatts, but this
is expected to double or even triple by 2020 to help to meet targets for
cutting CO2 emissions.
|