|
|
|
Homeowners
fight against the wind PIGEON
-- In the His
wife, Betty, says she thinks the towers are fine. "They're
majestic," she said. "But I'm bothered because it bothers
him." While
turbines are good for the environment and for farmers who reap thousands
of dollars a year from leasing their land to wind firms, some neighbors
aren't happy. They say towers sound like jet engines overhead that never
leave and they can feel the vibrations in their chests. Opponents
say tighter restrictions are needed. The wind industry says tougher
rules will keep wind farms out of Neighbors
object to noise, proximity and seek more limits On
a wind map of The
county hosts the state's two commercial wind farms. Besides good winds,
it has wind-friendly policies and plenty of agricultural land. Farmers
who lease acreage to wind companies are thrilled with the extra cash,
which amounts to several thousand dollars a year and sometimes five
figures. State
officials have bigger dreams: as many as 2,800 twirling towers in the
Thumb and another 1,200 in west But
in Wind
farms have generated anger, tension and conflict, even in places that
don't have any yet. The issues are height, how close turbines can be to
homes, property values, flickering shadows from blades and noise. Ten
Those
complaints, and others across the country, are being watched closely by
people in areas targeted for giant turbines. In
"It's
pitting neighbor against neighbor," said Valerie McCallum, clerk of
Some
governments, like Some
see the state as the 800-pound gorilla in the debate. They say state
wind zoning guidelines, developed by an informal working group with
industry input in 2005, are too lax. The guidelines have no height
restriction and allow turbines 300-400 feet from homes, a little more
than the length of a football field. Even pro-wind John
Sarver, chairman of the Michigan Wind Working Group, which came up with
the state guidelines, said he thinks the real issue isn't noise but the
visual impact of turbines. "We don't necessarily outlaw certain
developments based on individuals' reactions," he said. If
local governments pass too many restrictions, the state Legislature
could step in and dictate standards statewide, Lundberg said. That
happened in "It's
a huge challenge," Lundberg said of trying to balance the interests
of farmers, who want turbines because they bring in thousands of dollars
a year in income, and neighbors who are bothered by them. 'It's
affecting our health' When
David Peplinski found out wind turbines were coming to Ubly, he heard
that they would be no louder than a clothes dryer. Instead, several
nights a week, the noise drives him and his family from the house he
spent five years restoring. They rent an apartment where they sleep.
"It's affecting our health," he said. "When my wife and
kids sleep there, they feel much better." From
the kitchen sink of what was once his grandparents' home, he sees
turbines in two directions. The closest one is 1,300 feet, about a
quarter-mile away. At its worst, the blades sound like a helicopter
parked overheard. Peplinski said he can feel the low-frequency
vibrations, as well as hear the sound. The county's sound limit is 50
decibels, but officials have no way to check compliance. Peplinski
filed a formal complaint with the county over the noise, as did his
father, who lives nearby. In mid-October, a firm hired by John Deere,
which owns all 78 turbines in the county, will do sound testing at
people's homes, said planner Lundberg. Peplinski
and others troubled by the noise say putting turbines a mile away would
help with noise issues, as well as the flickering shadows cast when sun
hits the blades at certain angles. That
would mean fewer turbines in a given area, which doesn't make wind
companies happy. Joe DeVito, vice president of RES Americas, which hopes
to put 250-300 turbines in Peplinski,
who comes from a farm family, said he thinks too many people are blinded
by the money turbines bring. He's frustrated that his concerns have been
ignored. "I
understand the economics of this, the need for income," Peplinski
said. "What I don't understand is their unwillingness to take what
I say as valid." Rick
James, an acoustic expert in Okemos who has done pre- and post-turbine
testing for some homeowners, said there are noise complaints across the
country at commercial wind farms, including in the James
said some people are more sensitive to sound than others, and that there
are large variations in geography and even the size of rooms in a house
that affect what they hear. "There are people in every community
that aren't bothered, and those that are," he said. "If people
are getting ill and not sleeping, it's not good." James
said in a 2006 report before any turbines went up that the state and 'We
have to make the best of it' Angie
Weber, her husband, Randy, and their four kids have ended family
campouts in a tent in their yard, a favorite summer activity, after wind
turbine noise drove them inside this summer. No one slept well; the kids
needed naps. Even
when she's out running, wearing earphones, Weber can hear the blades.
The sound changes often, as the blades alter direction. "We
don't have an option of packing up and leaving; we have to make the best
of it," she told a state board in August. "Our entire lives'
investment is here." Her husband farms sugar beets, corn, wheat and
hay and raises beef cattle outside Ubly. Even
before 46 new turbines went up in the fall of 2008, Weber and others
collected more than 1,800 signatures on petitions to put the county wind
turbine zoning to a vote, but a judge ruled the petitions invalid.
"Some of us had done research and were concerned about the
setbacks," she said. "We thought they were too close." She
had acoustic expert James do testing at her home before the turbines,
and he found that at night, the ambient sound was in the high 20 decibel
range, quieter than some acoustic testing labs. Now,
the turbine across the road on a neighbor's farm is allowed to go up to
50 decibels at night. Planner
Lundberg said his county may revisit setbacks and noise levels for
future projects but won't do anything that would drive wind companies
away. "What happens if, because of 10 written complaints, we change
our standards to a point where it doesn't look like wind could work
here?" he said. "If
we can't make it work here, it's not going to work anywhere in Energy
board's 1 public advocate now works for wind firm Those
who live closest to Huron
County Zoning and Planning Director Russ Lundberg, a wind power
advocate, lives on Sand Point, a tiny finger of land on the county's
northern tip too skinny to fit turbines -- unless they end up offshore,
he noted. A
state board, the Michigan Wind Energy Resource Zone board, which is
examining where the best areas of the state are for wind, has 11
members. No members, however, are from Five
board members represent the wind industry: utilities planning wind
farms, wind developers, electricity transmission firms and alternative
energy companies. The other members represent environmental groups, the
attorney general, townships and cities. The
lone member chosen to represent the public, Mary Templeton, didn't work
for a wind firm when appointed in 2008, but she does now. Templeton
is listed as vice president of sales for Wind Energy Consulting &
Contracting, a In
e-mails to the Free Press, Templeton said her company focuses on smaller
wind projects rather than large commercial-size ones, so she doesn't see
a problem. "I see no reason why there would be any conflict of
interest, however, I will respectfully abstain from any vote that ...
represents a conflict of interest," she said. The
home page for Templeton's company says: "We deliver the total
package for wind energy projects large and small. ... Small to utility
scale. We do it all." Carolyn
Weed lives in
|